skip to content
The trial of the Germans : an account of the twenty-two defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg Preview this item
ClosePreview this item

The trial of the Germans : an account of the twenty-two defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg

Author: Eugene Davidson
Publisher: New York : Macmillan, ©1966.
Edition/Format:   Print book : Biography : EnglishView all editions and formats
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
An astute observer of the Nuremberg trial, Eugene Davidson has struggled with the issues it raised: Was it a necessary response to the heinous crimes of the Third Reich? How were Germany and the Germans capable of such extraordinary evil? Was the trial just, given the claims that the defendants were simply serving their country, doing as they had been told to do? And if not just, was it nonetheless necessary as a  Read more...
Getting this item's online copy... Getting this item's online copy...

Find a copy in the library

Getting this item's location and availability... Getting this item's location and availability...

WorldCat

Find it in libraries globally
Worldwide libraries own this item

Details

Additional Physical Format: Online version:
Davidson, Eugene, 1902-2002.
Trial of the Germans.
New York : Macmillan, ©1966
(OCoLC)567433337
Material Type: Biography
Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: Eugene Davidson
OCLC Number: 392940
Description: ix, 636, xl pages : 46 illustrations, portraits ; 25 cm
Contents: In the palace of justice --
The core of the conspiracy --
The number-two man --
The party in action and theory --
The diplomats --
The party and big business --
The law --
The youth leader --
The party, the police forces, and the army --
The navy --
The proconsuls --
The war plant and forced labor --
The propagandist --
The organizations --
Two decades later.
Responsibility: Eugene Davidson.

Abstract:

An astute observer of the Nuremberg trial, Eugene Davidson has struggled with the issues it raised: Was it a necessary response to the heinous crimes of the Third Reich? How were Germany and the Germans capable of such extraordinary evil? Was the trial just, given the claims that the defendants were simply serving their country, doing as they had been told to do? And if not just, was it nonetheless necessary as a warning to prevent future crimes against humanity? Davidson's approach to these and other large questions of justice is made through examination of each of the defendants in the trial. His reluctant, but firm, conclusion is: "In a world of mixed human affairs where a rough justice is done that is better than lynching or being shot out of hand, Nuremberg may be defended as a political event if not as a court." Some sentences may have seemed too severe, but none was harsher than the punishments meted out to innocent people by the regime these men served. "In a certain sense," says Davidson, "the trial succeeded in doing what judicial proceedings are supposed to do: it convinced even the guilty that the verdict against them was just." Faulty as the trial was from the legal point of view, a catharsis of the pent-up emotions of millions of people had to be provided and a record of what had taken place duly preserved for whatever use later generations would make of it.
Retrieving notes about this item Retrieving notes about this item

Reviews

User-contributed reviews

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.